Main Article Content
Physics is science that determines the living and life styles of the people. However, it has many misconceptions in the concepts. In this study, the effect of group work and traditional method in addressing the Class IX student’s misconceptions about light is investigated. The explanatory sequential mixed method was used for the study. It was carried out in one of the Middle Secondary School [MSS] under Trashigang district. The sample of this study consisted of 42 Class IX students and 5 science teachers. The data collection was done using multiple choice questions as pre-test and post-test with explanations. The semi-structured interview was conducted to support the quantitative findings.
The data obtained indicated that the students in the experimental group were more successful in addressing the misconception of light concept than the control group. The independent t-test result showed the significant difference in terms of mean score p<0.05 in the post test result. The result obtained from the study rejects the null hypothesis. The findings confirm that the group work is effective in addressing the misconceptions of light comparing to traditional method of teaching and learning.
Stein M. A study of common beliefs and misconceptions in physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 2008;20(2):1-11.
Canada FC, DGGR. Change in elementary school students’ misconceptions on material systems after a theoretical-practical instruction. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 2017;499-510.
Anthony G. Whither ability grouping: Changing the object of groupwork. Opening up Mathematics Education Research. 2016;117-125.
Mutch A. Employability or learning? Groupwork in higher education. Education + Training. 1998;50-56.
Shallcross R. Seeing the light. Common Misconception. 2017;5-7.
Djanette B. Detemination of university students' misconception about ight using concept map. Social and Behavioral Science. 2014;582-589.
Favale F. Misconceptions about optics: An effect of misleading explanations. ETOP. 2013;1-5.
Hadzibegovic Z, Slisko J. Changing university students' alternative conceptions of optics by active learning. C.E.P.S Journal. 2013;3:29-48.
Keles E. A study towards correcting student misconceptions related to the color issue in light unit with POE technique. Social and Behavioral Science. 2010;3134-3139.
Adair AM. Students' misconceptions about Newtonian mechanics: Origins and solutions through changes in instruction. ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis; Thesis (Ph.D.)-- The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA; 2013.
Celik H. An examination of cross sectional change in student’s metaphorical perceptions towards heat, temperature and energy concepts. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2016;4(3):229-245.
Kapici HO. Particulate nature of matter misconceptions held by middle and high school students in Turkey. European Journal of Education Studies. 2016;2(8), 43-58.
Widiyatmoko A. Literature review of factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in light andoptical optical instruments. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2018;13(10):853-863.
Saleh S. Malaysian students’ motivation towards physics learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2014;2(4):223-232.
Holubova R. Physics and everyday life: New modules to motivate students. US-China Education Review. 2013;114-118.
Baser M. Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Journal of Maltese Education Research. 2006;4(1):64-79.
Mekonnen S. Problems challenging the academic performance of physics students in higher governmental institutions in the case of arbaminch, Wolayita Sodo, Hawassa and Dilla Universities. Natural Science. 2014;362-375.
Ergin S. The effect of group work on misconceptions on 9th Grade students about Newtons laws. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2016;4(6):127-136.
Gilbert JK, Watts. Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education. 1983;61-98.
Lane, R. Students’ alternative conceptions in geography. Geographical Education. 2008;43-52.
Olusola OO. Attitudes of students towards the study of physics in college of education. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 2012;2(12), 86-89.
Demirci N. A study about student's misconceptions in force and motion. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2005;4(3):40-48.
Dole JA, Sinatra GM. Reconceptualising change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist. 1998;33:109-128.
Duit R. Conceptual change approaches in science education. New Perspectives on Conceptual Change. 1999;263-282.
Piaget J. The language and thought of the child. Routledge 11 New Fatter Lane, London, New York; 2001.
Stepans J. Targeting students' science misconceptions. Showboard, Inc; 2006.
Garbett D. Constructivism deconstructed in science teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2011;36-49.
Blizak D. Students misconception about light in Algeria. ETOP. 2009;1-8.
Chantaranima T. Grade 11 student's existing ideas about natures of light. Social and Behavioral Science. 2014;693-697.
Schutzenhofer CH. Students’ conceptions on white light and implications for teaching and learning about colour. Physics Education. 2017;52:1-8.
Uzun S. A cross-age study of an understanding of light and sight concepts in physics. Science Education International. 2013;24(2):129-149.
Ling TW. Fostering understanding and reducing misconceptions about image formation by a plane mirror using oncstructivist-based hands-on cctivities. Springer Singapore. 2017;203-223.
Oberoi M. Review of literature on students' misconception in science. International Journal of Scientific Research and Education. 2017;5(3):6274-6280.
Sesen BA. Internet as a source of misconception. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;94-100.
Boller BR. Non-traditional teaching styles in physics. EDRS, 1999;120:1-18.
Quan Gina. Improvements of students' understanding of heat andtemperature. 2011;1-16.
Chin Christine. Students' questions and discursive interactions: How they impact argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Contemporary Science Education Research. 2010;1-12.
Burke A. Group work: How to se groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching. 2011;87-95.
Alfares N. Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching. 2017;10(7):247-257.
Sofroniou A, Poutos K. Investigating the effectiveness of groupwork. Educational Science. 2016;1-15.
Harris G, Bristow D. The role of group regulation in student groups: A pedagogical exploration. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 2016;10(2):47-59.
Slavin RE. Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research. 2010;315-342.
Wang Z. Effects of heterogenous and homogeneous grouping on student's learning. 2013;1-56.
Teaching skills (1st ed.). Paro: National Institute of Education, Paro; 2003.
Kagan S. A brief history of Kagan structures. Kagan Online Magazine, 2003; 4-23.
Maqbool J. Group work and the impact, if any, of the use of google applications for education. 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. 2016;149-156.
Goris T, Dyrenfurth M. Students' misconceptions in science, technology and engineering. ResearchGate, 2014;1-16.
Aksoy G, Gurbuz F. Group investigation teaching technique in Turkish primary science courses. Balkan Physics Letters. 2013;99-106.
Johnson RT, Johnson DW. Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Physical Science Magazine. 2013;19-20.
Harlow JB, Meyertholen D. Effective student teams for collaborative learning in an introductory university physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2016;12:01-11.
Borg M, Kembro J, Notander JP, Petersson C, Ohlsson L. Conflict management in student groups-a teacher's perspective in higher education. Hogre Utbildning. 2011;1(2):111-124.
Hodges LC. Ten research-based steps for effective group work. IDEA Paper. 2017;65:1-11.
Milicevic D, Pecic L. Cooperative learning in teaching physics and art in secondary schools. Series: Physics, Chemistry and Technology. 2016;14(1):61-78.
Taqi HA, Al-Nouh NA. Effect of group work on EFL students' attitudes and learning higher education. Journal of Education and Learning. 2014;3(2):52-65.
Tarhan L, Sesen B. Jigsaw cooperative learning. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012; 13:307-313.
Khurram MF. Cognitive development in Jean Piaget’s work and its implications for teachers. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2011;1260-1265.
Zhiqing Z. Assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration. International Forum of Teaching and Studies. 2015;84-89.
Baines E. The challenges of implementing group-work in primary school classrooms including pupils with Special Educational Needs. Special Issue of Education. 2015; 1-18.
Linneman JA. Share, show and tell: Group discussion or simulation versus lecture teaching strategies in a research method course. American Sociological Association. 2018;47(1):22-31.
Moraes C, Michailidou N. Students' attitude toward a group coursework protocol and peer assessment system. Open Research Online. 2016;30(2):117-128.
Roberts TS. Seven problems of online group learning. Educatonal Technology and Society. 2007;257-268.
Chiriac EH. Group work as an incentive for learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;1-10.